Comparison
Paranusskerne vs Paranoten
Overall, Paranusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paranusskerne | Paranoten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 697 kcal | 706 kcal |
| Fat | 66.5 g | 70 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.3 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 9.9 g | 7.5 g |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paranoten has 24% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Paranusskerne has 24% more fiber (9.9 g vs 7.5 g).
- Paranusskerne has 17% more protein (16.9 g vs 14 g).
Ingredients
Paranusskerne
Not available.
Paranoten
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paranusskerne or Paranoten?
Overall, Paranusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paranusskerne has fewer calories: 697 kcal versus 706 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paranoten has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.