Comparison
Panna da cucina vs Nata montar
Overall, Panna da cucina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Panna da cucina | Nata montar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 335 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna da cucina has 33% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 335 kcal).
- Panna da cucina has 37% less fat (22 g vs 35 g).
- Panna da cucina has 38% less saturated fat (15 g vs 24 g).
- Nata montar has 22% less sugar (3.1 g vs 4 g).
- Panna da cucina has 20% more protein (2.5 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Panna da cucina
Panna, stabilizzante: carragenina
Nata montar
cream , stabilizers (carrogenans, e451, cellulose, e466),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna da cucina or Nata montar?
Overall, Panna da cucina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna da cucina has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata montar has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 4 g per 100 g.