Panna da cucina vs Nata Culinária, -70% gordura*
Overall, Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Panna da cucina | Nata Culinária, -70% gordura... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 43% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 224 kcal).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 55% less fat (10 g vs 22 g).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 52% less saturated fat (7.2 g vs 15 g).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 14% more protein (2.9 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Panna da cucina
Panna, stabilizzante: carragenina
Nata Culinária, -70% gordura*
_Nata_ (10% M.G.), amido modificado, emulsionantes: E 472b e E 471 e estabilizador: E 407.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna da cucina or Nata Culinária, -70% gordura*?
Overall, Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 224 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna da cucina has less sugar: 4 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.