Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* vs Nata montar
Overall, Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Nata Culinária, -70% gordura... | Nata montar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 128 kcal | 335 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.2 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 62% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 335 kcal).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 71% less fat (10 g vs 35 g).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 70% less saturated fat (7.2 g vs 24 g).
- Nata montar has 30% less sugar (3.1 g vs 4.4 g).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 31% more protein (2.9 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Nata Culinária, -70% gordura*
_Nata_ (10% M.G.), amido modificado, emulsionantes: E 472b e E 471 e estabilizador: E 407.
Nata montar
cream , stabilizers (carrogenans, e451, cellulose, e466),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* or Nata montar?
Overall, Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata montar has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.