Nata Cocinar vs Nata montar
Overall, Nata Cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Nata Cocinar | Nata montar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 335 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 5 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Cocinar has 51% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 335 kcal).
- Nata Cocinar has 57% less fat (15 g vs 35 g).
- Nata Cocinar has 58% less saturated fat (10 g vs 24 g).
Ingredients
Nata Cocinar
_Nata_ ligera, almidón modificado de maíz, emulgente (E-471) estabilizantes (E-415, E-451, E-460, E-466).lactosa
Nata montar
cream , stabilizers (carrogenans, e451, cellulose, e466),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nata Cocinar or Nata montar?
Overall, Nata Cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Cocinar has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata Cocinar has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.