Panna da cucina vs Nata Cocinar
Overall, Nata Cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Panna da cucina | Nata Cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 163 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 5 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Cocinar has 27% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 224 kcal).
- Nata Cocinar has 32% less fat (15 g vs 22 g).
- Nata Cocinar has 33% less saturated fat (10 g vs 15 g).
- Nata Cocinar has 25% less sugar (3 g vs 4 g).
- Panna da cucina has 20% more protein (2.5 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Panna da cucina
Panna, stabilizzante: carragenina
Nata Cocinar
_Nata_ ligera, almidón modificado de maíz, emulgente (E-471) estabilizantes (E-415, E-451, E-460, E-466).lactosa
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna da cucina or Nata Cocinar?
Overall, Nata Cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Cocinar has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 224 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata Cocinar has less sugar: 3 g versus 4 g per 100 g.