Nata Cocinar vs Smetana ke slehani
Overall, Nata Cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nata Cocinar | Smetana ke slehani |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 299 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 21.7 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Cocinar has 45% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 299 kcal).
- Nata Cocinar has 52% less fat (15 g vs 31 g).
- Nata Cocinar has 54% less saturated fat (10 g vs 21.7 g).
Ingredients
Nata Cocinar
_Nata_ ligera, almidón modificado de maíz, emulgente (E-471) estabilizantes (E-415, E-451, E-460, E-466).lactosa
Smetana ke slehani
smetana, stabilizátor: karagenan
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nata Cocinar or Smetana ke slehani?
Overall, Nata Cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Cocinar has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 299 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smetana ke slehani has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3 g per 100 g.