Crème entière fluide30% mat. gr. vs Panna da cucina
Overall, Panna da cucina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Crème entière fluide30% mat.... | Panna da cucina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 293 kcal | 224 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna da cucina has 24% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 293 kcal).
- Panna da cucina has 27% less fat (22 g vs 30 g).
- Panna da cucina has 29% less saturated fat (15 g vs 21 g).
- Crème entière fluide30% mat. gr. has 15% less sugar (3.4 g vs 4 g).
- Crème entière fluide30% mat. gr. has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Crème entière fluide30% mat. gr.
Crème de LAIT, stabilisants : carraghénanes. Elaboré à partir de lait origine France.
Panna da cucina
Panna, stabilizzante: carragenina
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème entière fluide30% mat. gr. or Panna da cucina?
Overall, Panna da cucina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna da cucina has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crème entière fluide30% mat. gr. has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 4 g per 100 g.