Pan Ducale vs Torta nocciole e cacao con pasta frolla croccante
Overall, Pan Ducale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pan Ducale | Torta nocciole e cacao con p... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 418 kcal | 504 kcal |
| Fat | 17.8 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.7 g | 6.2 g |
| Sugars | 30.5 g | 31 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 4.2 g | — |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 8 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pan Ducale has 17% fewer calories (418 kcal vs 504 kcal).
- Pan Ducale has 34% less fat (17.8 g vs 27 g).
- Torta nocciole e cacao con pasta frolla croccante has 19% less saturated fat (6.2 g vs 7.7 g).
- Pan Ducale has 30% more protein (9.6 g vs 6.7 g).
- Only Pan Ducale lists: Eggs, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pan Ducale
INGREDIENTS: Pasteurized fresh eggs, Whole wheat flour, Cane sugar, Almonds, Dark Chocolate (sugar, cocoa mass, cocoa butter, soy lecithin, natural F vanilla extract), Butter, Glucose - fructose syrup, Candied citron, Milk proteins, Emulsifier (E471-E477, E420 stabilizer, flavor), Raising agent (disodium diphosphate, Sodium acid carbonate), Flavours, Salt. Preservative: Sorbic acid. CONTAINS GLUTEN, ALMONDS, EGGS, MILK AND SOY. 4, NET WT 10.5
Torta nocciole e cacao con pasta frolla croccante
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pan Ducale or Torta nocciole e cacao con pasta frolla croccante?
Overall, Pan Ducale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pan Ducale has fewer calories: 418 kcal versus 504 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pan Ducale has less sugar: 30.5 g versus 31 g per 100 g.