Comparison
Palmaria palmara vs Wilde dulse
Overall, Wilde dulse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Palmaria palmara | Wilde dulse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 227 kcal | 227 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 22.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 28 g |
| Protein | 17.2 g | 17.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Palmaria palmara has no saturated fat, while Wilde dulse has 1.1 g.
- Wilde dulse has no sugar, while Palmaria palmara has 22.6 g.
- Wilde dulse has 61% less salt (1.7 g vs 4.2 g).
- Wilde dulse has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Palmaria palmara
Not available.
Wilde dulse
verse zeewier met zeezout
FAQ
Which is healthier: Palmaria palmara or Wilde dulse?
Overall, Wilde dulse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Palmaria palmara has fewer calories: 227 kcal versus 227 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wilde dulse has less sugar: 0 g versus 22.6 g per 100 g.