Comparison

Paleta de cebo iberica vs Paleta de cebo iberica

Overall, Paleta de cebo iberica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPaleta de cebo ibericaPaleta de cebo iberica
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 372 kcal 277 kcal
Fat 28 g 16 g
Saturated fat 8.8 g 5.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 4.7 g 3.6 g
Protein 29 g 32.3 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Paleta de cebo iberica has 26% fewer calories (277 kcal vs 372 kcal).
  • Paleta de cebo iberica has 43% less fat (16 g vs 28 g).
  • Paleta de cebo iberica has 40% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Paleta de cebo iberica has 23% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Paleta de cebo iberica has 10% more protein (32.3 g vs 29 g).

Ingredients

Paleta de cebo iberica

Not available.

Paleta de cebo iberica

Paleta de cerdo de cebo ibérico, sal, azúcar, antioxidantes (E-331, E-301) y conservadore (E-252, E-250).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Paleta de cebo iberica or Paleta de cebo iberica?

Overall, Paleta de cebo iberica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Paleta de cebo iberica has fewer calories: 277 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Paleta de cebo iberica has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons