Comparison
Pak choi vs Kinakål
Overall, Pak choi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pak choi | Kinakål |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 15 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kinakål has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Pak choi has 22% less sugar (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Pak choi has 27% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Pak choi
Pak choi
Kinakål
Kinakål.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pak choi or Kinakål?
Overall, Pak choi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kinakål has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pak choi has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.