Comparison
Chou chinois vs Kinakål
Overall, Chou chinois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chou chinois | Kinakål |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 16 kcal | 15 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | — |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chou chinois has 34% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Chou chinois
chou chinois 100%
Kinakål
Kinakål.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chou chinois or Kinakål?
Overall, Chou chinois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kinakål has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 16 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chou chinois has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.