Comparison

Oseille coupée vs Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty

Overall, Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOseille coupéeCzosnek niedźwiedzi cięty
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 23 kcal 111 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 1.5 g 1.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.8 g 5.8 g
Protein 1.8 g 5.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Oseille coupée has 79% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 111 kcal).
  • Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 64% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 20% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 69% more fiber (5.8 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 66% more protein (5.3 g vs 1.8 g).

Ingredients

Oseille coupée

Oseille

Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty

czosnek niedźwiedzi

FAQ

Which is healthier: Oseille coupée or Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty?

Overall, Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Oseille coupée has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons