Oseille coupée vs Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty
Overall, Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oseille coupée | Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 23 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oseille coupée has 79% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 64% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 20% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 69% more fiber (5.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 66% more protein (5.3 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Oseille coupée
Oseille
Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty
czosnek niedźwiedzi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oseille coupée or Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty?
Overall, Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oseille coupée has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.