Herbes à la française vs Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty
Overall, Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Herbes à la française | Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 25 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 18% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 136 kcal).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 93% less fat (0.3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 99% less saturated fat (0 g vs 1.3 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 87% less sugar (1.2 g vs 9.3 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 100% less salt (0 g vs 25 g).
- Herbes à la française has 24% more protein (7 g vs 5.3 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Herbes à la française
Not available.
Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty
czosnek niedźwiedzi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Herbes à la française or Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty?
Overall, Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.