Herbes à la française vs Flüssiger Bio-Dill
Overall, Flüssiger Bio-Dill has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Herbes à la française | Flüssiger Bio-Dill |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.3 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 25 g | 9.3 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Flüssiger Bio-Dill has 79% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 136 kcal).
- Flüssiger Bio-Dill has 86% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Flüssiger Bio-Dill has no saturated fat, while Herbes à la française has 1.3 g.
- Flüssiger Bio-Dill has 69% less sugar (2.9 g vs 9.3 g).
- Flüssiger Bio-Dill has 63% less salt (9.3 g vs 25 g).
- Herbes à la française has 80% more protein (7 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Herbes à la française
Not available.
Flüssiger Bio-Dill
Dill 37%, Branntweinessig, Wasser, Meersalz, Verdickungsmittel Xanthan.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Herbes à la française or Flüssiger Bio-Dill?
Overall, Flüssiger Bio-Dill has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Flüssiger Bio-Dill has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flüssiger Bio-Dill has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.