Flüssiger Bio-Dill vs Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty
Overall, Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flüssiger Bio-Dill | Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 9.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Flüssiger Bio-Dill has 74% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 59% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 100% less salt (0 g vs 9.3 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has 74% more protein (5.3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better Nutri-Score.
- Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Flüssiger Bio-Dill
Dill 37%, Branntweinessig, Wasser, Meersalz, Verdickungsmittel Xanthan.
Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty
czosnek niedźwiedzi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flüssiger Bio-Dill or Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty?
Overall, Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Flüssiger Bio-Dill has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Czosnek niedźwiedzi cięty has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.