Orxata vs Tiger Nut Milk
Overall, Tiger Nut Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Orxata | Tiger Nut Milk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 12.4 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tiger Nut Milk has 17% less fat (2.5 g vs 3 g).
- Tiger Nut Milk has 42% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Tiger Nut Milk has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Orxata
Agua, chufas (16%), azúcar, emulgente: citrogllcéridos estabilizantes: gel de celulosa y goma de celulosa, corrector de la acidez: citrato de sodio aromas naturales de limón y canela.
Tiger Nut Milk
Ingredientes: Agua, chufas (9%), azúcar, emulgente (E-472c), estabilizantes (gel de celulosa y goma de celulosa) y aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Orxata or Tiger Nut Milk?
Overall, Tiger Nut Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tiger Nut Milk has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 84 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tiger Nut Milk has less sugar: 12 g versus 12.4 g per 100 g.