Comparison

Original Bacon vs Filet de bacon

Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOriginal BaconFilet de bacon
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 474 kcal 123 kcal
Fat 36.8 g 3 g
Saturated fat 13.2 g 1.7 g
Sugars 5.3 g 1.2 g
Salt 4.6 g 2.8 g
Fiber — 0.9 g
Protein 36.8 g 22.3 g
Additives14
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de bacon has 74% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 474 kcal).
  • Filet de bacon has 92% less fat (3 g vs 36.8 g).
  • Filet de bacon has 87% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 13.2 g).
  • Filet de bacon has 77% less sugar (1.2 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Filet de bacon has 40% less salt (2.8 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Original Bacon has 39% more protein (36.8 g vs 22.3 g).
  • Filet de bacon has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Original Bacon is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Original Bacon

Water, salt, sugar, sodium phosphates, sodium ascorbate, sodium nitrite.

Filet de bacon

Filet de porc (Origine : France), sel, acidifiant: lactate de sodium, dextrose, correcteur d'acidité : citrates de sodium, sucre, arômes, arômes de fumée, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium , conservateur : nitrite de sodium, Traces éventuelles de lait, de moutarde, de fruits à coque et de soja,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Original Bacon or Filet de bacon?

Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de bacon has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 474 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de bacon has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons