Orange Marmalade Fine Cut vs Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja
Overall, Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Orange Marmalade Fine Cut | Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 66 g | 55 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Orange Marmalade Fine Cut has no fat, while Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has 0.5 g.
- Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has 17% less sugar (55 g vs 66 g).
- Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Orange Marmalade Fine Cut
Sugar, Seville Oranges, Citrus Pectin
Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja
Sauerkirschen (37%), Zucker, Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Pfirsiche (11 %), Maracujas (2 %), Geliermittel: Pektine; Sauerungsmittel: Citronensaure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Orange Marmalade Fine Cut or Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja?
Overall, Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has less sugar: 55 g versus 66 g per 100 g.