Comparison

Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier vs Olives

Overall, Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOlives Apéro Herbes de Prove...Olives
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 123 kcal 194 kcal
Fat 11 g 19 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 2.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.2 g
Salt 3.5 g 3.7 g
Fiber 4.2 g 3.9 g
Protein 0.9 g 1.4 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has 37% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 194 kcal).
  • Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has 42% less fat (11 g vs 19 g).
  • Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has 26% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Olives has 36% more protein (1.4 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier

Olives vertes dénoyautées, olives noires confites dénoyautées, sel, herbes de Provence (1,3%*), huile d'olive vierge extra, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique, antioxydant: acide ascorbique. (*% par rapport au poids net égoutté). Produit pasteurisé.Origine: Olives de Grèce et d'Espagne. Ces olives dénoyautées mécaniquement peuvent contenir exceptionnellement des noyaux ou fragments de noyau.

Olives

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier or Olives?

Overall, Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons