Olives vs Colossal olives
Overall, Colossal olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives | Colossal olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 156 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 15.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colossal olives has 20% fewer calories (156 kcal vs 194 kcal).
- Colossal olives has 16% less fat (15.9 g vs 19 g).
- Olives has 15% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 2.7 g).
- Colossal olives has 49% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.7 g).
- Colossal olives has 11% more fiber (4.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Olives has 29% more protein (1.4 g vs 1 g).
- Colossal olives has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Olives
Not available.
Colossal olives
GREEN HALKIDIKI OLIVES (57%), Water, EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL (1.5%), Salt, Acidity Regulators: Citric Acid, Lactic Acid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives or Colossal olives?
Overall, Colossal olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colossal olives has fewer calories: 156 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colossal olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.