Comparison

Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier vs Colossal olives

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOlives Apéro Herbes de Prove...Colossal olives
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 123 kcal 156 kcal
Fat 11 g 15.9 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 2.7 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 3.5 g 1.9 g
Fiber 4.2 g 4.4 g
Protein 0.9 g 1 g
Additives22
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has 21% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 156 kcal).
  • Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has 31% less fat (11 g vs 15.9 g).
  • Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has 37% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Colossal olives has 46% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Colossal olives has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier

Olives vertes dénoyautées, olives noires confites dénoyautées, sel, herbes de Provence (1,3%*), huile d'olive vierge extra, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique, antioxydant: acide ascorbique. (*% par rapport au poids net égoutté). Produit pasteurisé.Origine: Olives de Grèce et d'Espagne. Ces olives dénoyautées mécaniquement peuvent contenir exceptionnellement des noyaux ou fragments de noyau.

Colossal olives

GREEN HALKIDIKI OLIVES (57%), Water, EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL (1.5%), Salt, Acidity Regulators: Citric Acid, Lactic Acid

FAQ

Which is healthier: Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier or Colossal olives?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 156 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Olives Apéro Herbes de Provence Tramier has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons