Nut & Fruit Mix Classic vs Studentenfutter Luxury Nut and Raisin Mix
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nut & Fruit Mix Classic | Studentenfutter Luxury Nut a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 534 kcal | 507 kcal |
| Fat | 36.9 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 30.9 g | 32 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Peanuts | Nuts, Nusskernmischung, Cashew nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Studentenfutter Luxury Nut and Raisin Mix has 11% less fat (33 g vs 36.9 g).
- Studentenfutter Luxury Nut and Raisin Mix has 20% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 4.6 g).
- Nut & Fruit Mix Classic has 100% more fiber (6.5 g vs 0 g).
- Nut & Fruit Mix Classic is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Nut & Fruit Mix Classic lists: Peanuts.
- Only Studentenfutter Luxury Nut and Raisin Mix lists: Nusskernmischung, Cashew nuts.
Ingredients
Nut & Fruit Mix Classic
40% светли стафиди (светли стафиди, слънчо - гледово масло), 20% бланширани бадеми, 15% орехи, 10% лешници, 10% бразилски орехи, 5% кашу, Може да съдържа следи от други ядки, фъстъци,
Studentenfutter Luxury Nut and Raisin Mix
mixed nuts (in varying proportions: _hazelnuts_, _almonds_ blanched, _cashew nuts_), dried raisins, _walnuts_, sunflower oil
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nut & Fruit Mix Classic or Studentenfutter Luxury Nut and Raisin Mix?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Studentenfutter Luxury Nut and Raisin Mix has fewer calories: 507 kcal versus 534 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nut & Fruit Mix Classic has less sugar: 30.9 g versus 32 g per 100 g.