Nüsse: Macadamia vs Nueces de macadamia
Overall, Nueces de macadamia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nüsse: Macadamia | Nueces de macadamia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 754 kcal | 758 kcal |
| Fat | 76 g | 77 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 6.3 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 8.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nueces de macadamia has 19% less sugar (3.5 g vs 4.3 g).
- Nueces de macadamia has 81% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Nüsse: Macadamia has 30% more fiber (9 g vs 6.3 g).
- Only Nueces de macadamia lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Nüsse: Macadamia
Macadamia-Nusskerne, Speisesalz (1 %). Produkt kann Spuren von Erdnusskernen und anderen Schalenfrüchten enthalten.
Nueces de macadamia
_Nueces de macadamia_, sal,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nüsse: Macadamia or Nueces de macadamia?
Overall, Nueces de macadamia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nüsse: Macadamia has fewer calories: 754 kcal versus 758 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nueces de macadamia has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.