Nüsse: Macadamia vs Macadamia
Overall, Macadamia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nüsse: Macadamia | Macadamia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 754 kcal | 747 kcal |
| Fat | 76 g | 75 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 4.3 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 8.4 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 8.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Macadamia has 31% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Nüsse: Macadamia
Macadamia-Nusskerne, Speisesalz (1 %). Produkt kann Spuren von Erdnusskernen und anderen Schalenfrüchten enthalten.
Macadamia
macadamia-Nusskerne 99%, Speisesalz 1%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nüsse: Macadamia or Macadamia?
Overall, Macadamia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Macadamia has fewer calories: 747 kcal versus 754 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nüsse: Macadamia has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.