Nocciolbio vs Natù
Overall, Natù has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nocciolbio | Natù |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 540 kcal | 666 kcal |
| Fat | 34.9 g | 59 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.3 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 39 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 8.2 g | 7.6 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nocciolbio has 19% fewer calories (540 kcal vs 666 kcal).
- Nocciolbio has 41% less fat (34.9 g vs 59 g).
- Natù has 24% less saturated fat (6.3 g vs 8.3 g).
- Natù has 97% less sugar (1 g vs 39 g).
- Nocciolbio has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Natù has 64% more protein (22 g vs 7.9 g).
- Natù has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Nocciolbio lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Nocciolbio
"zucchero di canna, "cacao magro in polvere 25%, *olio di girasole, "pasta di nocciole 12%, "burro di cacao. "ingrediente biologico Organismo di controllo autorizzato dal Mipaaf IT BIO 007. Operatore controllato nºA65S. Allergeni: può contenere tracce di altra frutta a guscio. Conservazione: l'olio si può raccogliere in superficie, mescolare prima dell'uso.
Natù
Semi di girasole alto oleico tostati* 91%, olio di semi di girasole*, burro di cacao*, proteine da semi di girasole* 1,5%, sale. *Biologico. Può contenere _soia_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nocciolbio or Natù?
Overall, Natù has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nocciolbio has fewer calories: 540 kcal versus 666 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Natù has less sugar: 1 g versus 39 g per 100 g.