Nocciolbio vs Cocco crunchy
Overall, Cocco crunchy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nocciolbio | Cocco crunchy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 540 kcal | 504 kcal |
| Fat | 34.9 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.3 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 39 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 8.2 g | 17 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocco crunchy has 93% less sugar (2.6 g vs 39 g).
- Cocco crunchy has 52% more fiber (17 g vs 8.2 g).
- Cocco crunchy has 39% more protein (13 g vs 7.9 g).
- Cocco crunchy has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Nocciolbio lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Nocciolbio
"zucchero di canna, "cacao magro in polvere 25%, *olio di girasole, "pasta di nocciole 12%, "burro di cacao. "ingrediente biologico Organismo di controllo autorizzato dal Mipaaf IT BIO 007. Operatore controllato nºA65S. Allergeni: può contenere tracce di altra frutta a guscio. Conservazione: l'olio si può raccogliere in superficie, mescolare prima dell'uso.
Cocco crunchy
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nocciolbio or Cocco crunchy?
Overall, Cocco crunchy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cocco crunchy has fewer calories: 504 kcal versus 540 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocco crunchy has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 39 g per 100 g.