Santoto crème de pistacchio vs Nocciolbio
Overall, Nocciolbio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Santoto crème de pistacchio | Nocciolbio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 571 kcal | 540 kcal |
| Fat | 39 g | 34.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.2 g | 8.3 g |
| Sugars | 44 g | 39 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 9.9 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nocciolbio has 11% less fat (34.9 g vs 39 g).
- Nocciolbio has 11% less sugar (39 g vs 44 g).
- Santoto crème de pistacchio has 20% more protein (9.9 g vs 7.9 g).
- Nocciolbio is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Santoto crème de pistacchio lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Santoto crème de pistacchio
Sugar, pistachio (Pistacia vera) 20%, sunflower, whole milk powder, skimmed_milk powder, cocca butter, natural vanilla flavoring. Emulsifers: Sunflower lecithin. Colouring: E100-E141.
Nocciolbio
"zucchero di canna, "cacao magro in polvere 25%, *olio di girasole, "pasta di nocciole 12%, "burro di cacao. "ingrediente biologico Organismo di controllo autorizzato dal Mipaaf IT BIO 007. Operatore controllato nºA65S. Allergeni: può contenere tracce di altra frutta a guscio. Conservazione: l'olio si può raccogliere in superficie, mescolare prima dell'uso.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Santoto crème de pistacchio or Nocciolbio?
Overall, Nocciolbio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nocciolbio has fewer calories: 540 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nocciolbio has less sugar: 39 g versus 44 g per 100 g.