Nappage Fruits rouges vs Fruits rouges
Overall, Nappage Fruits rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nappage Fruits rouges | Fruits rouges |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 31 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nappage Fruits rouges has 44% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 127 kcal).
- Nappage Fruits rouges has 61% less sugar (12 g vs 31 g).
- Nappage Fruits rouges has 74% more fiber (1.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Nappage Fruits rouges has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fruits rouges lists: None.
Ingredients
Nappage Fruits rouges
Purée de fraise (49,7%), purée de framboise (20%), eau, sucre, amidon modifié, purée de cassis (2,2%)
Fruits rouges
Purées de fruits partiellement à base de concentré 42% (fraise, griotte, cassis, framboise, myrtille), sucre, eau, stabilisants (pectine, gomme de xanthane), arôme naturel de framboise, arôme naturel de fraise, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nappage Fruits rouges or Fruits rouges?
Overall, Nappage Fruits rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nappage Fruits rouges has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 127 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nappage Fruits rouges has less sugar: 12 g versus 31 g per 100 g.