Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark vs Mus owocowy
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymba... | Mus owocowy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 13.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mus owocowy has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Mus owocowy has 41% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark
przeciery: mango (40%), jabłka (33%), banany (13%) i brzoskwinie (12%)
Mus owocowy
Przecier jabłkowy (45%), przecier l bananowy (35%), przecier malinowy (10%), Z przecier gruszkowy (5%), sok jabłkowy (5%) P z zagęszczonego soku jabłkowego, witamina C.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark or Mus owocowy?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has less sugar: 13 g versus 13.3 g per 100 g.