Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark vs Dada Bio mus + kokos
Overall, Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymba... | Dada Bio mus + kokos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 83 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has 22% fewer calories (65 kcal vs 83 kcal).
- Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has 81% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.6 g).
- Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.4 g).
- Dada Bio mus + kokos has 15% less sugar (11 g vs 13 g).
- Dada Bio mus + kokos has 46% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark
przeciery: mango (40%), jabłka (33%), banany (13%) i brzoskwinie (12%)
Dada Bio mus + kokos
Przecier jabłkowy* 30%, przecier bananowy 25%, przecier z mango* 22%, krem kokosowy 13% (ekstrakt z kokosa* 10%, woda), przecier morelowy, witamina C
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark or Dada Bio mus + kokos?
Overall, Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dada Bio mus + kokos has less sugar: 11 g versus 13 g per 100 g.