Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark vs Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady
Overall, Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark
Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymba... | Mus owocowy o smaku czekolad... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has 40% fewer calories (65 kcal vs 109 kcal).
- Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady has 15% less sugar (11 g vs 13 g).
- Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady has 19% more fiber (1.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady has 95% more protein (11 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark
przeciery: mango (40%), jabłka (33%), banany (13%) i brzoskwinie (12%)
Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark or Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady?
Overall, Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mus owocowy o smaku czekolady has less sugar: 11 g versus 13 g per 100 g.