Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark vs EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko
Overall, EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark
EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymba... | EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 51 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 9.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko has 22% fewer calories (51 kcal vs 65 kcal).
- EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko has 25% less sugar (9.8 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark
przeciery: mango (40%), jabłka (33%), banany (13%) i brzoskwinie (12%)
EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko
100% przecier z jabłek
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muss mango brzoskwinia Tymbark or EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko?
Overall, EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 65 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
EkoDobro Mus jabłkowy eko has less sugar: 9.8 g versus 13 g per 100 g.