Comparison
Múka na pizzu vs Múka hrubá
Overall, Múka na pizzu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Múka na pizzu | Múka hrubá |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 340 kcal | 349 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | — |
| Protein | 11.5 g | — |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Múka na pizzu has 29% less fat (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Múka na pizzu has 44% less sugar (1 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Múka na pizzu
Not available.
Múka hrubá
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Múka na pizzu or Múka hrubá?
Overall, Múka na pizzu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Múka na pizzu has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Múka na pizzu has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.