Comparison
Múka na pizzu vs Múka pšeničná hladká BIO
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Múka na pizzu | Múka pšeničná hladká BIO |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 340 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 11.5 g | 11.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Múka na pizzu has 41% less fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Múka pšeničná hladká BIO has 19% more fiber (3.1 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Múka na pizzu
Not available.
Múka pšeničná hladká BIO
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Múka na pizzu or Múka pšeničná hladká BIO?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Múka na pizzu has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Múka na pizzu has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.