Comparison
Múka pšeničná hladká BIO vs Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Múka pšeničná hladká BIO | Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 344 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 4.2 g |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Múka pšeničná hladká BIO has 35% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO has 26% more fiber (4.2 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Múka pšeničná hladká BIO
Not available.
Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Múka pšeničná hladká BIO or Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Múka pšeničná hladká BIO has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Múka pšeničná hladká BIO has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.