Comparison
Múka hrubá vs Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO
Overall, Múka hrubá has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Múka hrubá | Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 349 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.2 g |
| Protein | — | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Múka hrubá has 18% less fat (1.4 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Múka hrubá
Not available.
Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Múka hrubá or Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO?
Overall, Múka hrubá has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Múka hrubá has fewer calories: 349 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Múka pšeničná chlebová BIO has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.