Comparison
Múka hrubá vs Tempura
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Múka hrubá | Tempura |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 349 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | — | 2.5 g |
| Protein | — | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tempura has 29% less fat (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Múka hrubá has 50% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Múka hrubá
Not available.
Tempura
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Múka hrubá or Tempura?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Múka hrubá has fewer calories: 349 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Múka hrubá has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.