Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons vs Abricots en oreillons
Overall, Abricots en oreillons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons
Abricots en oreillons
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mirabelles de Lorraine en or... | Abricots en oreillons |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 6.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abricots en oreillons has 47% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 81 kcal).
- Abricots en oreillons has 60% less sugar (6.4 g vs 16 g).
- Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons has 25% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons
Mirabelle
Abricots en oreillons
Abricot, acide ascorbique, acide citrique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mirabelles de Lorraine en oreillons or Abricots en oreillons?
Overall, Abricots en oreillons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricots en oreillons has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abricots en oreillons has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 16 g per 100 g.