Comparison

Mini Rolls Milk Chocolate vs Costa Chocman

Overall, Costa Chocman has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMini Rolls Milk ChocolateCosta Chocman
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 462 kcal 400 kcal
Fat 23.7 g 14.3 g
Saturated fat 11 g 10.3 g
Sugars 43 g 40.7 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.6 g
Fiber 2.3 g 2 g
Protein 4.8 g 4.7 g
Additives724
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansEggs, Gluten, Milk, None, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Costa Chocman has 13% fewer calories (400 kcal vs 462 kcal).
  • Costa Chocman has 40% less fat (14.3 g vs 23.7 g).
  • Only Costa Chocman lists: None.

Ingredients

Mini Rolls Milk Chocolate

Milk chocolate 34% (Sugar, Cocoa mass, Cocoa butter, Dried skimmed _milk_, _Milk_ fat, Vegetable fat (Palm), Dried whey (from _milk_), Emulsifier (_Soya_ lecithin)), Vanilla flavour filling 28% (Vegetable oils (Palm, Rapeseed), Glucose syrup, Dextrose, Sugar, Water, Emulsifier (E471), Flavouring), Sugar, _Wheat_ flour (with added Calcium, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, Glucose syrup, Humectant (Glycerol), Dried whole _egg_, Fat reduced cocoa, Vegetable oils (Palm, Rapeseed), Dried whey (from _milk_), _Soya_ flour, Raising agents (E450, Sodium bicarbonate), Dried _egg_ white, Emulsifier (E471), Salt.

Costa Chocman

Bizcocho [harina de trigo fortificada, azúcar, huevo líquido pasteurizado, jarabe de glucosa, almidón de maíz, aceite vegetal, humectantes (SIN 422, SIN 420ii), etanol, emulsionantes (SIN 471, SIN 1520 Y SIN 475), permeato de suero en polvo, leche descremada en polvo, sal, proteína láctea, leudante (SIN 500i, SIN 341i), conservantes (SIN 202, SIN 282, SIN 216, SIN 218), espesantes (SIN 466, SIN 475), aroma artificial, aroma natural, reguladores de acidez (SIN 334, SIN 330)], cobertura sabor chocolate [azúcar, grasa vegetal, suero de leche en polvo, cacao en polvo, permeato de suero en polvo, harina de algarrobo, emulsionantes (lecitina de soya, SIN 476), aroma natural, aroma artificial], manjar [azúcar, jarabe de glucosa, leche entera en polvo, suero de leche en polvo, humectante (SIN 422), almidón de maíz, grasa vegetal, espesantes (SIN 407, SIN 406), regulador de acidez (SIN 500ii), conservante (SIN 202), beta-galactosidasa].

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mini Rolls Milk Chocolate or Costa Chocman?

Overall, Costa Chocman has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Costa Chocman has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Costa Chocman has less sugar: 40.7 g versus 43 g per 100 g.

More comparisons