Costa Chocman vs Chocman
Overall, Costa Chocman has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Costa Chocman | Chocman |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 428 kcal |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 16.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.3 g | 11.5 g |
| Sugars | 40.7 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 24 | 16 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, None, Soybeans | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, None, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Costa Chocman has 14% less fat (14.3 g vs 16.6 g).
- Costa Chocman has 10% less saturated fat (10.3 g vs 11.5 g).
- Costa Chocman has 17% less sugar (40.7 g vs 49 g).
- Costa Chocman has 27% more protein (4.7 g vs 3.4 g).
- Only Chocman lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Costa Chocman
Bizcocho [harina de trigo fortificada, azúcar, huevo líquido pasteurizado, jarabe de glucosa, almidón de maíz, aceite vegetal, humectantes (SIN 422, SIN 420ii), etanol, emulsionantes (SIN 471, SIN 1520 Y SIN 475), permeato de suero en polvo, leche descremada en polvo, sal, proteína láctea, leudante (SIN 500i, SIN 341i), conservantes (SIN 202, SIN 282, SIN 216, SIN 218), espesantes (SIN 466, SIN 475), aroma artificial, aroma natural, reguladores de acidez (SIN 334, SIN 330)], cobertura sabor chocolate [azúcar, grasa vegetal, suero de leche en polvo, cacao en polvo, permeato de suero en polvo, harina de algarrobo, emulsionantes (lecitina de soya, SIN 476), aroma natural, aroma artificial], manjar [azúcar, jarabe de glucosa, leche entera en polvo, suero de leche en polvo, humectante (SIN 422), almidón de maíz, grasa vegetal, espesantes (SIN 407, SIN 406), regulador de acidez (SIN 500ii), conservante (SIN 202), beta-galactosidasa].
Chocman
Azúcar, Harina de Trigo, Aceite Vegetal (Palma Fraccionado e interesterificado, Palmiste Fraccionado, Palma Hidrogenado), Huevos, Jarabe de Fructosa, Leche Entera en Polvo, Suero de Leche en Polvo, Glicerina, Sorbitol, Aceite Vegetal (Maravilla, Soya), Cacao en Polvo, Glucosa, Proteína de Leche, Etanol, Emulsificante (Mono y Diglicéridos), Almidón Modificado, Sal, Lecitina de Soya, Bicarbonato de Sodio, Preservante (Sorbato de Potasio, Difosfato Disódico (SIN 450i)), Carboximetilcelulosa, Agar Agar, Propionato de Calcio, Saborizantes Idénticos a Natural, Saborizante Artificial, Preservante (Benzoato de Sodio, Ácido Láctico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Costa Chocman or Chocman?
Overall, Costa Chocman has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Costa Chocman has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 428 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Costa Chocman has less sugar: 40.7 g versus 49 g per 100 g.