Milk Classic Rice Snack vs Topokki
Overall, Topokki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milk Classic Rice Snack | Topokki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 567 kcal | 251 kcal |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 10 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Topokki has 56% fewer calories (251 kcal vs 567 kcal).
- Topokki has 99% less fat (0.5 g vs 36.7 g).
- Topokki has 97% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 6.7 g).
- Topokki has 79% less sugar (2.1 g vs 10 g).
- Milk Classic Rice Snack has 85% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Milk Classic Rice Snack has 100% more fiber (3.3 g vs 0 g).
- Topokki has 23% more protein (4.3 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Milk Classic Rice Snack lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Milk Classic Rice Snack
RICE, PALM OIL, CORN FLOUR, WHEAT FLOUR, CORN STARCH, WHOLE MILK POWDER, WHEY POWDER, TREHALOSE, DEXTROSE, SALT, CALCIUM CARBONATE, NATURAL MILK FLAVOR
Topokki
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milk Classic Rice Snack or Topokki?
Overall, Topokki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Topokki has fewer calories: 251 kcal versus 567 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Topokki has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 10 g per 100 g.