Milbona kruidenboter vs Kruidenboter
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milbona kruidenboter | Kruidenboter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 650 kcal | 681 kcal |
| Fat | 70.6 g | 74.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 49.9 g | 42.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Celery, Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kruidenboter has 14% less saturated fat (42.7 g vs 49.9 g).
- Kruidenboter has 71% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kruidenboter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Milbona kruidenboter lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Milbona kruidenboter
86% roomboter (melk), water, kruiden (1,6% bieslook, 1,6% peterselie, 0,6% selderij, 0,2% kervell, gedroogde ui, gedroogde knoflook, zout, peperextract, gistextract, smaakversterker, mononatriumglutamaat, conserveermiddel alumsorbaat, verdikkingsmiddel: quarpitmeel, natuurlijk aroma
Kruidenboter
Roomboter (MELK) (75,6%), raapolie (11,9%), bieslook, peterselie, knoflook, zout, witte peper. conserveermiddelen (E202; E270)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milbona kruidenboter or Kruidenboter?
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milbona kruidenboter has fewer calories: 650 kcal versus 681 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kruidenboter has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.