Kruidenboter vs Kruidenboter
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kruidenboter | Kruidenboter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 596 kcal | 681 kcal |
| Fat | 64.6 g | 74.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 41.8 g | 42.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kruidenboter has 12% fewer calories (596 kcal vs 681 kcal).
- Kruidenboter has 13% less fat (64.6 g vs 74.4 g).
Ingredients
Kruidenboter
76% Roomboter (MELK) water, 5% kruiden (peterselie, bieslook dragon, oregano, kervel), 0,8% specerijen, knoflookpoeder, uipoeder, zout, gistextract, zoethoutwortelpoeder, suiker, conserveermiddel: E270/E202, voedingszuur: citroen zuur.
Kruidenboter
Roomboter (MELK) (75,6%), raapolie (11,9%), bieslook, peterselie, knoflook, zout, witte peper. conserveermiddelen (E202; E270)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kruidenboter or Kruidenboter?
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kruidenboter has fewer calories: 596 kcal versus 681 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kruidenboter has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.