Kruidenboter vs Kruidenboter knoflook
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kruidenboter | Kruidenboter knoflook |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 596 kcal | 728 kcal |
| Fat | 64.6 g | 79 g |
| Saturated fat | 41.8 g | 48 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kruidenboter has 18% fewer calories (596 kcal vs 728 kcal).
- Kruidenboter has 18% less fat (64.6 g vs 79 g).
- Kruidenboter has 13% less saturated fat (41.8 g vs 48 g).
- Only Kruidenboter lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kruidenboter
76% Roomboter (MELK) water, 5% kruiden (peterselie, bieslook dragon, oregano, kervel), 0,8% specerijen, knoflookpoeder, uipoeder, zout, gistextract, zoethoutwortelpoeder, suiker, conserveermiddel: E270/E202, voedingszuur: citroen zuur.
Kruidenboter knoflook
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kruidenboter or Kruidenboter knoflook?
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kruidenboter has fewer calories: 596 kcal versus 728 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kruidenboter has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.