Kruidenboter figuur vs Kruidenboter
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kruidenboter figuur | Kruidenboter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 686 kcal | 681 kcal |
| Fat | 75.1 g | 74.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 50.3 g | 42.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kruidenboter has 15% less saturated fat (42.7 g vs 50.3 g).
Ingredients
Kruidenboter figuur
91% boter (melk), 3,5% bieslook, 3,5% peterselie, zout, 0,7% knoflook, witte peper, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat.
Kruidenboter
Roomboter (MELK) (75,6%), raapolie (11,9%), bieslook, peterselie, knoflook, zout, witte peper. conserveermiddelen (E202; E270)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kruidenboter figuur or Kruidenboter?
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kruidenboter has fewer calories: 681 kcal versus 686 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kruidenboter has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.