Kruidenboter figuur vs Knoflookboter
Overall, Kruidenboter figuur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kruidenboter figuur | Knoflookboter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 686 kcal | 696 kcal |
| Fat | 75.1 g | 74.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 50.3 g | 47 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kruidenboter figuur has 82% less sugar (0.6 g vs 3.3 g).
- Knoflookboter has 37% less salt (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Kruidenboter figuur is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kruidenboter figuur
91% boter (melk), 3,5% bieslook, 3,5% peterselie, zout, 0,7% knoflook, witte peper, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat.
Knoflookboter
boter (melk), raapzaadolie, water, 3,5% gedroogde knoflook, gedroogde ui, zout, citroenaroma, kaneel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kruidenboter figuur or Knoflookboter?
Overall, Kruidenboter figuur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kruidenboter figuur has fewer calories: 686 kcal versus 696 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kruidenboter figuur has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.