Milbona kruidenboter vs Knoflookboter
Overall, Milbona kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milbona kruidenboter | Knoflookboter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 650 kcal | 696 kcal |
| Fat | 70.6 g | 74.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 49.9 g | 47 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milbona kruidenboter has 48% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Milbona kruidenboter lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Milbona kruidenboter
86% roomboter (melk), water, kruiden (1,6% bieslook, 1,6% peterselie, 0,6% selderij, 0,2% kervell, gedroogde ui, gedroogde knoflook, zout, peperextract, gistextract, smaakversterker, mononatriumglutamaat, conserveermiddel alumsorbaat, verdikkingsmiddel: quarpitmeel, natuurlijk aroma
Knoflookboter
boter (melk), raapzaadolie, water, 3,5% gedroogde knoflook, gedroogde ui, zout, citroenaroma, kaneel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milbona kruidenboter or Knoflookboter?
Overall, Milbona kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milbona kruidenboter has fewer calories: 650 kcal versus 696 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milbona kruidenboter has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.