Comparison

Milbona kruidenboter vs Kruidenboter

Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMilbona kruidenboterKruidenboter
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 2
Calories 650 kcal 565 kcal
Fat 70.6 g 62.1 g
Saturated fat 49.9 g 39.1 g
Sugars 1.7 g 1 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 0.5 g
Protein 1 g 1 g
Additives11
AllergensCelery, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kruidenboter has 13% fewer calories (565 kcal vs 650 kcal).
  • Kruidenboter has 12% less fat (62.1 g vs 70.6 g).
  • Kruidenboter has 22% less saturated fat (39.1 g vs 49.9 g).
  • Kruidenboter has 41% less sugar (1 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Kruidenboter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Milbona kruidenboter lists: Celery, Milk.

Ingredients

Milbona kruidenboter

86% roomboter (melk), water, kruiden (1,6% bieslook, 1,6% peterselie, 0,6% selderij, 0,2% kervell, gedroogde ui, gedroogde knoflook, zout, peperextract, gistextract, smaakversterker, mononatriumglutamaat, conserveermiddel alumsorbaat, verdikkingsmiddel: quarpitmeel, natuurlijk aroma

Kruidenboter

BOTERBEREIDING, BEVAT 62% MELKVET INGREDIENTEN EX roomboter imelk, water, 27% peterselie, 2% bieslook luflodiqneder, poeder, conserveringsmiddelen EZ E ut zwarte peper, dragon cayennepeper, oregano, leriander, kenel komijn gemberpoeder, venkelzaad with peper gstextract, nootmuskaat, lavas zoethoutwortel poeder, suiker, voedingszuur (E330

FAQ

Which is healthier: Milbona kruidenboter or Kruidenboter?

Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kruidenboter has fewer calories: 565 kcal versus 650 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kruidenboter has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons